What conclusions have we reached?
Actually, we have no idea what is valuable anymore. In other words, SEO valuation is simply some sort of happy agreement between search engine providers, hardware and sensor companies, a few software companies and big brains in both tech and financial markets that can influence and/or impact the outcome of search rankings on a day to day or longer term time horizon.
In other words our SEO Automation and artificial intelligence strategy is, in flux, and, during theoretical brain storming sessions, remain generalist in nature and in the realm of theory, while, during set moments, in time, entering into the SEO Automation space-time continuum with momentary analysis of current market trends to make simple actions or writings.
To state simply, if one considers anything 'historical' at face value, we are completely inaccurate. Too much information and there is a much greater liklihood of community exile and loss of potential readers and users, too little and the information commits the extreme error of omission and can be considered as equally inaccurate. Do nothing, and wait for markets and others to 'ebb and flow' in ranking outcomes and the SEO becomes, in some opinions, antithetical to the underlying reasons for formation of search engines and the unforeseen reason(s) of the usage, adoption and proliferation of the internet.
In other words, the question that was posed at the beginning is either completely irrelevant or somewhat inaccurate when viewing the world in the context of SEO, SEO Automation and Artificial Intelligence, in that, the sphere of technology cannot be currently contained by the usage of the word 'conclusions', and the more accurate word is, what additional questions can be reasonably asked, with the capabilities, capacity and available resources that is inline to current scenarios in the offline world to further our SEO Automation site's progress in accordance with our ideal outcomes?